Delhi excise policy case: Kejriwal calls verdict ‘victory of truth’; breaks down after clean chit
Prosecution failed to present convincing material to sustain the allegations against them, says Delhi court
PTC Web Desk: In a significant development in the Delhi excise policy case, a Delhi court has granted relief to former Deputy Chief Minister Manish Sisodia as well as Arvind Kejriwal, stating that the prosecution failed to present convincing material to sustain the allegations against them.
The court observed that serious charges require substantive evidence and cannot rest on broad or unsubstantiated claims. It noted that attributing a central conspiratorial role without credible proof weakens the very foundation of criminal prosecution. The judge further remarked that public faith in constitutional offices is compromised when allegations are not backed by solid material.
While discharging Sisodia, the court held that the documents placed on record, along with witness statements, reflected administrative discussions rather than any clear criminal intent. It concluded that the case did not pass the threshold required for continuing prosecution.
Reacting to the verdict, Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal described the order as a vindication of truth. Addressing supporters and media personnel, an emotional Kejriwal said the judgment reaffirmed his belief that honesty ultimately prevails. He urged political rivals to focus on governance and public welfare rather than attempting to destabilise elected governments.
Kejriwal also appealed for the preservation of constitutional values, asserting that democratic institutions must not be weakened through unfounded allegations. He questioned why political parties could not seek public mandate by addressing pressing concerns such as corruption, unemployment, and pollution instead of engaging in power struggles.
The ruling is expected to have a considerable political impact, particularly ahead of upcoming electoral contests, as it reshapes the narrative around one of the most debated cases in recent years.