SC orders resumption of Punjab Kesari printing press after pollution board action
The group also pointed out that a hotel it operates was recently closed on similar orders from the Pollution Board.
PTC News Desk: The Supreme Court on Tuesday directed the media group Punjab Kesari to resume its printing press uninterruptedly notwithstanding the Punjab State Pollution Control Board's decision to snap power supply due to alleged violations.
The printing press had been shut on the directions of the Punjab Pollution Control Board, prompting the media group—which publishes the largest-circulation Hindi and Punjabi newspapers in the state—to accuse the Aam Aadmi Party-led Punjab government of targeted harassment in recent weeks. The group also pointed out that a hotel it operates was recently closed on similar orders from the Pollution Board.
On Tuesday, a Bench comprising Chief Justice of India Surya Kant and Justices Joymalya Bagchi and V.M. Pancholi directed the immediate resumption of operations at the printing press after an urgent plea by Jagat Vijay Printers and The Hindu Samachar Limited was mentioned before the court.
Senior Advocate Mukul Rohatgi and Advocate Mahesh Agarwal raised the matter at around 10.30 am, informing the Bench that action was being taken against the media house because its newspapers had carried reports critical of the state government. Taking note of the submissions, the court heard the matter immediately and ordered that the printing press be allowed to function without interruption, while maintaining status quo at the premises.
Earlier, on Monday, the Punjab and Haryana High Court had reserved its verdict on similar petitions filed by the media group challenging the closure of both its hotel and printing press. However, a Bench led by Chief Justice Sheel Nagu had indicated its reluctance to grant interim relief and suggested that the newspaper group approach the National Green Tribunal instead.
The Supreme Court clarified that the interim relief granted on Tuesday would remain in force for one week after the High Court delivers its judgment. The newspaper group also argued that the High Court’s refusal to grant interim relief despite a strong prima facie case had created a chilling effect on freedom of speech.