Supreme Court orders complete ban on Class 8 NCERT chapter over ‘defamatory’ content on judiciary
PTC Web Desk: In a strong rebuke, the Supreme Court has ordered a complete prohibition on a Class 8 NCERT textbook chapter dealing with corruption in courts, describing portions of the content as damaging to the credibility of the judiciary. The Bench, headed by Chief Justice Surya Kant, directed authorities to ensure that all physical and digital copies of the book are withdrawn from circulation with immediate effect.
The court observed that the material appeared to cast aspersions on the institution of the judiciary and could erode public confidence. Making stern remarks during the hearing, the Chief Justice stated that the publication gave the impression of a deliberate attempt to tarnish the image of the judicial system. He emphasised that safeguarding the dignity of constitutional institutions was a paramount responsibility.
The order came a day after the National Council of Educational Research and Training (NCERT) expressed regret over what it termed “incorrect content” in the chapter and assured the court that it would be revised. However, the Bench was not convinced by the explanation offered. The Chief Justice noted that the communication from NCERT seemed more like a justification of the material rather than a clear and unconditional apology.
The court has issued show-cause notices to the Director of NCERT and the Secretary of the School Education Department, asking them to explain why contempt proceedings should not be initiated against those responsible for approving the content. The Bench underlined that accountability must be fixed and that individuals found responsible would not be spared.
According to the court, exposing students of a formative age to what it described as a “one-sided narrative” could shape perceptions in a manner that undermines faith in the justice delivery system. It cautioned that while fair and constructive criticism of institutions is permissible in a democracy, presenting content in a manner that appears prejudicial is unacceptable.
The Supreme Court clarified that its action is not aimed at stifling legitimate academic debate or informed criticism. Rather, it is intended to preserve the institutional integrity and public trust in the judiciary. The Bench directed NCERT as well as education departments of the Centre and states to ensure that no version of the textbook concerned , whether in print or online, remains accessible to the public.
Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, appearing for the Ministry of Education, tendered an unconditional apology before the court. Nonetheless, the Bench maintained that a mere apology would not suffice without identifying how the material was vetted and approved.
The matter is scheduled for further hearing on March 11, when the court is expected to examine compliance with its directions and responses from the officials concerned.
- With inputs from agencies
