Thu, Apr 25, 2024
Whatsapp

Porn film case: Raj Kundra's bail plea rejected

Written by  Jasleen Kaur -- July 28th 2021 05:01 PM -- Updated: July 28th 2021 05:07 PM
Porn film case: Raj Kundra's bail plea rejected

Porn film case: Raj Kundra's bail plea rejected

A Mumbai court on Wednesday rejected the bail plea of businessman Raj Kundra in a case related to the alleged creation of pornographic films and publishing them through some apps. Raj Kundra, husband of Bollywood actor Shilpa Shetty, was arrested on July 19 by the Mumbai police's crime branch in the pornography case after being booked under relevant sections of the Indian Penal Code and the Information Technology Act. When Shilpa Shetty told Raj Kundra their relationship 'won't work', didn't let him 'woo' her | Bollywood - Hindustan Times On Tuesday, a magistrate's court here remanded him in judicial custody for 14 days. Raj Kundra had filed a bail plea, but the court rejected it on Wednesday. Also Read | For first time since June 10 last year, Punjab records zero COVID-19 deaths in 24 hours On Tuesday, the Bombay High Court had also refused to give him any urgent temporary relief. The police claimed that during the probe into the porn film case, it was found Raj Kundra set up Armsprime Media Pvt Ltd, which, through London-based Kenrin Pvt Ltd, bought 'Hotshots' app to upload objectional videos on social media. Raj Kundra Pornography Case: Businessman's bail hearing in Bombay High Court tomorrow | Celebrities News – India TV Also read | Covid outbreak: Stranded Canadians taking long route to return home They had also alleged that Raj Kundra earned over Rs 1.17 crore between August and December last year by uploading pronographic content online, through Hotshots. shilpa shetty husband raj kundra porn film case mumbai crime branch explains modus operandi | Porn Film Case : अशी होती राज कुंद्राची मोडस ऑपरेंडी; क्राईम ब्रांचनं केला खुलासा! | Loksatta The High Court had sought a response from the Mumbai Police in a plea by Raj Kundra, alleging that his arrest was illegal as he was not served legal notices as per law. The court said it cannot decide on granting interim relief and pass an order without hearing respondent authorities and adjourned the hearing in the plea. -PTC News


Top News view more...

Latest News view more...